![]() |
Are Metal Fillings Poisoning Your Health? |
|
|
Are your metal fillings poisoning your health? If “attention grabbing” is illegal, that question gets us indicted. Our defense? We are guilty of sometimes being too passionate about dental health, in this case encouraging you to pause and consider the condition of those hardworking back teeth. To our knowledge, no scientific evidence exits anywhere that shows any direct link between metal fillings and poor health. So why do we never put amalgam into clients’ teeth, and candidly espouse its removal? Because the non-metallic alternatives are significantly kinder to those teeth. Clients tell us their mouth looks and feels healthier, too, once their metal fillings have been replaced with tooth-colored restorations. Our records show that we stopped placing dental amalgam in 1997. Since 1995, we have placed over 8,000 bonded, composite fillings in back teeth. Of those 8,000, about twenty teeth required replacement at our cost due to temperature and/or bite sensitivity not present prior to treatment. Before 1997, we regularly made excuses for the cold sensitivity associated with metal fillings. The only excuse we make for our tooth-colored fillings is that replacing lost tooth structure on occasion requires more than what a filling can accomplish, at which point a cap is necessary to protect and strengthen the remaining tooth structure. Due to the bonding effect of the non-metallic restorative techniques and our extensive experience with them, we probably recommend fewer caps than offices that continue to place metal fillings in back teeth.
"CAPS"
VS. "FILLINGS" PROTOCOL Back teeth in the following situations should be protected with lab-processed crowns or partial crowns in place of common fillings:
STRONG
TEETH VS. WEAK TEETH
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|